Junkers Ju 288
Design & Development
Prior to the opening of World War II, the Luftwaffe bomber force included three major types, the Dornier Do 17
and Ju 88, both classed as schnellbomber, and the slower but somewhat larger Heinkel He 111. Although the Ju 88
outperformed the other designs in service, it however possessed adverse characteristics, including its very small
internal bomb bay that forced it to carry some of its load externally, degrading performance.
Junkers Ju 288
[Source: ww2aircraft.net]
Junkers had been outlining a variety of improved models of the Ju 88 since 1937, powered by the planned Jumo 222
multibank engine, or Jumo 223 inline multibank diesel of greatly increased power meant to achieve a 2,000
horsepower (1,500 kW) output level, a serious challenge for Germany's aviation engine industry of the time.
The EF 074 was essentially a scaled-up Ju 88, sharing its general layout and most of its fuselage and wings
with extensions in various places. The nose was redesigned with a more streamlined "stepless cockpit", having
no separate windscreen panels for the pilot and co-pilot. This layout allowed cabin pressurization to be more
easily implemented. This design approach had been growing in favour, subsequently appearing in various
German types, notably the He 111P and -H's.
All of the defensive armament was meant to be remotely controlled — in one proposal, comprising a remotely
operated rear-facing dorsal turret at the rearmost end of the cockpit glazing, and two remotely operated "flank"
turrets on the rearwards sides of the fuselage just forward of the empennage, otherwise each resembling the FDSL
131 units of the Me 210. The exclusive use of remotely operated turrets for the Ju 288's defensive firepower
allowed them to be positioned more efficiently, as well as eliminating "breaks" in the fuselage
pressurization.
The fuselage was expanded along its length to allow for a much longer bomb bay — somewhat as had been done with
the Dornier Do 217 then in development itself — that would allow for a 3,630 kg (8,000 lb) payload to be carried
internally, eliminating the need to carry ordnance on outside hardpoints.
No serious work was undertaken on these versions, but after Heinrich Hertel left Heinkel and joined Junkers in
1939, the EF 074 design was submitted to the RLM in May 1939. Accordingly, the RLM sent out the specifications
for the Bomber B design competition in July, the Ju 88 retroactively becoming the second aircraft to be
designated Bomber A, as the 3 June 1936 specification for the He 177 also had that name. The Bomber B program
aimed at replacing all of the medium bombers in the Luftwaffe inventory with a new design based on the EF.74 or
something with equal performance. Bomber B was intended to have even better speed than the Ju 88, high-altitude
cruising with a pressurised cockpit, heavier defensive armament, range allowing it to cover any point in the
British Isles, and a 4,000 kg (8,820 lb) warload, double that of the earlier generation bombers. A number
of companies returned proposals, but these were to some extent a formality, the EF.74 had already been
selected as the winner, and of the rest of the designs submitted, only the Focke-Wulf Fw 191 and Dornier
Do 317 progressed even as far as prototypes, and the Henschel Hs 130 coming under consideration as a late
entrant.
Work began on building prototypes soon after, and the first example was completed by mid-1940. Power was supposed
to be supplied by two 24-cylinder Jumo 222 six-bank, four cylinders per bank, over-1,500 kW output class
powerplants, but problems with the Jumo 222's development — as with almost every new concept for over-1,500 kW
output, reciprocating aircraft engines then underway in the Third Reich — meant the first prototypes flew with
BMW 801 radial engines, instead. The first flight-quality 222s did not arrive until October 1941, and even at
this point it was clear they were nowhere near ready for full-scale production. When it became apparent the
222 was not likely to become a viable powerplant, in May 1942, Junkers proposed replacing them, for their
projected Ju 288C version, with the much heavier Daimler Benz DB 606s instead; the same 1.5 tonne,
twin-crankcase "welded-together engines" that Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring complained about some three
months later, regarding the He 177's own endless powerplant troubles.
Junkers Ju 288
[Source: ww2aircraft.net]
Undercarriage difficulties
The Ju 288's intricate main landing gear system's design proved to be troublesome, possessing twin vertical members comprising the main "Y-shaped" retraction strut unit, directly behind a single oleo strut, for each pair of twinned wheels mounted through a forward-projecting lever-action arm, to the lower end of the uniquely attached main oleo strut unit. This single-tube oleo strut was pivoted off the lower end of the twin-member, "Y-shaped" retraction strut unit, and was rotated in the vertical plane about this single attachment in a rearwards direction during retraction of the maingear unit, separate from the twin-member unit to help "shorten" its stowed length within the engine nacelle. This distinctive type of design required the oleo strut's freely moving top end to physically rotate downwards and aftwards during the rear-swinging retraction of the main "Y-shaped" member, operated by a lever and gear-sector system mounted on the portside of each main gear assembly, operated with a long lever that had its upper end pivoted from a fixed bracket, anchored to the firewall's rear surface. The lever/sector gear system swiveled the oleo strut about its attachment point during the retract cycle, through an arc of roughly 180° from its position when the main gear was fully extended. The stowed position of the oleo strut ended up orienting it aftwards within the rear of the engine nacelle, and placing the wheels' axle location just ahead of and above the oleo strut's pivot point when fully retracted. Such a complex main gear design, with only the single pivoting retraction point for its oleo struts taking the primary stress of touchdown, was likely only one of the many potential sources of trouble causing the Ju 288's main gear units to repeatedly collapse on touchdown.
Sources:
Gunston, Bill - The Encyclodepia of the Worlds Combat aircraft, 1976, Chartwell Books, Inc., New York
Brown, Eric, Captain - Wings of the Luftwaffe, 1979, Airlife Publishing Ltd., Shrewsbury
Gunston, Bill & Wood, Tony - Hitler's Luftwaffe, 1977, Salamander Books Ltd., London
Donald, David - The Complete Encyclopedia Of World Aircraft, 1997, Brown Packaging Books Ltd., London
Wikipedia - Junkers Ju 288
Gunston, Bill - The Encyclodepia of the Worlds Combat aircraft, 1976, Chartwell Books, Inc., New York
Brown, Eric, Captain - Wings of the Luftwaffe, 1979, Airlife Publishing Ltd., Shrewsbury
Gunston, Bill & Wood, Tony - Hitler's Luftwaffe, 1977, Salamander Books Ltd., London
Donald, David - The Complete Encyclopedia Of World Aircraft, 1997, Brown Packaging Books Ltd., London
Wikipedia - Junkers Ju 288